Microsoft SQL Server Training Classes in New Rochelle, New York
Learn Microsoft SQL Server in New Rochelle, NewYork and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current Microsoft SQL Server related training offerings in New Rochelle, New York: Microsoft SQL Server Training
Microsoft SQL Server Training Catalog
subcategories
Microsoft SQL Server Classes
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- Fast Track to Java 17 and OO Development
12 August, 2024 - 16 August, 2024 - RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX AUTOMATION WITH ANSIBLE
3 June, 2024 - 6 June, 2024 - Introduction to C++ for Absolute Beginners
20 May, 2024 - 21 May, 2024 - RED HAT SATELLITE V6 (FOREMAN/KATELLO) ADMINISTRATION
24 June, 2024 - 27 June, 2024 - Object-Oriented Programming in C# Rev. 6.1
24 June, 2024 - 28 June, 2024 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
It is said that spoken languages shape thoughts by their inclusion and exclusion of concepts, and by structuring them in different ways. Similarly, programming languages shape solutions by making some tasks easier and others less aesthetic. Using F# instead of C# reshapes software projects in ways that prefer certain development styles and outcomes, changing what is possible and how it is achieved.
F# is a functional language from Microsoft's research division. While once relegated to the land of impractical academia, the principles espoused by functional programming are beginning to garner mainstream appeal.
As its name implies, functions are first-class citizens in functional programming. Blocks of code can be stored in variables, passed to other functions, and infinitely composed into higher-order functions, encouraging cleaner abstractions and easier testing. While it has long been possible to store and pass code, F#'s clean syntax for higher-order functions encourages them as a solution to any problem seeking an abstraction.
F# also encourages immutability. Instead of maintaining state in variables, functional programming with F# models programs as a series of functions converting inputs to outputs. While this introduces complications for those used to imperative styles, the benefits of immutability mesh well with many current developments best practices.
For instance, if functions are pure, handling only immutable data and exhibiting no side effects, then testing is vastly simplified. It is very easy to test that a specific block of code always returns the same value given the same inputs, and by modeling code as a series of immutable functions, it becomes possible to gain a deep and highly precise set of guarantees that software will behave exactly as written.
Further, if execution flow is exclusively a matter of routing function inputs to outputs, then concurrency is vastly simplified. By shifting away from mutable state to immutable functions, the need for locks and semaphores is vastly reduced if not entirely eliminated, and multi-processor development is almost effortless in many cases.
Type inference is another powerful feature of many functional languages. It is often unnecessary to specify argument and return types, since any modern compiler can infer them automatically. F# brings this feature to most areas of the language, making F# feel less like a statically-typed language and more like Ruby or Python. F# also eliminates noise like braces, explicit returns, and other bits of ceremony that make languages feel cumbersome.
Functional programming with F# makes it possible to write concise, easily testable code that is simpler to parallelize and reason about. However, strict functional styles often require imperative developers to learn new ways of thinking that are not as intuitive. Fortunately, F# makes it possible to incrementally change habits over time. Thanks to its hybrid object-oriented and functional nature, and its clean interoperability with the .net platform, F# developers can gradually shift to a more functional mindset while still using the algorithms and libraries with which they are most familiar.
Related F# Resources:
Python and Ruby, each with roots going back into the 1990s, are two of the most popular interpreted programming languages today. Ruby is most widely known as the language in which the ubiquitous Ruby on Rails web application framework is written, but it also has legions of fans that use it for things that have nothing to do with the web. Python is a big hit in the numerical and scientific computing communities at the present time, rapidly displacing such longtime stalwarts as R when it comes to these applications. It too, however, is also put to a myriad of other uses, and the two languages probably vie for the title when it comes to how flexible their users find them.
A Matter of Personality...
That isn't to say that there aren't some major, immediately noticeable, differences between the two programming tongues. Ruby is famous for its flexibility and eagerness to please; it is seen by many as a cleaned-up continuation of Perl's "Do What I Mean" philosophy, whereby the interpreter does its best to figure out the meaning of evening non-canonical syntactic constructs. In fact, the language's creator, Yukihiro Matsumoto, chose his brainchild's name in homage to that earlier language's gemstone-inspired moniker.
Python, on the other hand, takes a very different tact. In a famous Python Enhancement Proposal called "The Zen of Python," longtime Pythonista Tim Peters declared it to be preferable that there should only be a single obvious way to do anything. Python enthusiasts and programmers, then, generally prize unanimity of style over syntactic flexibility compared to those who choose Ruby, and this shows in the code they create. Even Python's whitespace-sensitive parsing has a feel of lending clarity through syntactical enforcement that is very much at odds with the much fuzzier style of typical Ruby code.
For example, Python's much-admired list comprehension feature serves as the most obvious way to build up certain kinds of lists according to initial conditions:
a = [x**3 for x in range(10,20)]
b = [y for y in a if y % 2 == 0]
first builds up a list of the cubes of all of the numbers between 10 and 19 (yes, 19), assigning the result to 'a'. A second list of those elements in 'a' which are even is then stored in 'b'. One natural way to do this in Ruby is probably:
a = (10..19).map {|x| x ** 3}
b = a.select {|y| y.even?}
but there are a number of obvious alternatives, such as:
a = (10..19).collect do |x|
x ** 3
end
b = a.find_all do |y|
y % 2 == 0
end
It tends to be a little easier to come up with equally viable, but syntactically distinct, solutions in Ruby compared to Python, even for relatively simple tasks like the above. That is not to say that Ruby is a messy language, either; it is merely that it is somewhat freer and more forgiving than Python is, and many consider Python's relative purity in this regard a real advantage when it comes to writing clear, easily understandable code.
And Somewhat One of Performance
No matter what type of business you’re in, boosting your bottom line is always in the back of your mind. In a rough economy, it can be tempting to focus too much on pulling in more money and not enough on containing it from within.
That’s right, containing it. You have the potential to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars every year right under your nose from something as simple as lack of or ineffective computer training.
How much do the employees you have working for you right now really understand about technology? How good is your IT tech department? Technology changes faster than a blink of an eye and oftentimes, businesses struggle to keep their top employees trained.
With millions of dollars being lost to Internet espionage, file corruption and other computer crimes, staying on top of changes is essential. Recently, online learning centers have been emerging as the go-to method for quick and inexpensive learning. Unfortunately, this type of computer learning isn’t always the best solution.
Structure Rule Language
To aid in the ease of rule authoring, Blaze Software, now Fair Isaac, created the proprietary Structure Rule Language (SRL), an object-oriented programming language designed to enable those with little or no background in software development to pen rules. Although the capabilities of this language are far too extensive to detail in this article, we can examine the basic rule syntax.
Rules in the SRL take the following form:
rule RuleName [at
Tech Life in New York
Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
---|---|---|---|
NYSE Euronext, Inc. | New York | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
Anderson Instrument Company Inc. | Fultonville | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
News Corporation | New York | Media and Entertainment | Radio and Television Broadcasting |
Philip Morris International Inc | New York | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Loews Corporation | New York | Travel, Recreation and Leisure | Hotels, Motels and Lodging |
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Jarden Corporation | Rye | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Ralph Lauren Corporation | New York | Retail | Clothing and Shoes Stores |
Icahn Enterprises, LP | New York | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
Viacom Inc. | New York | Media and Entertainment | Media and Entertainment Other |
Omnicom Group Inc. | New York | Business Services | Advertising, Marketing and PR |
Henry Schein, Inc. | Melville | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Medical Supplies and Equipment |
Pfizer Incorporated | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
Eastman Kodak Company | Rochester | Computers and Electronics | Audio, Video and Photography |
Assurant Inc. | New York | Business Services | Data and Records Management |
PepsiCo, Inc. | Purchase | Manufacturing | Nonalcoholic Beverages |
Foot Locker, Inc. | New York | Retail | Department Stores |
Barnes and Noble, Inc. | New York | Retail | Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores |
Alcoa | New York | Manufacturing | Metals Manufacturing |
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Personal Health Care Products |
Avon Products, Inc. | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Personal Health Care Products |
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | New York | Financial Services | Banks |
Marsh and McLennan Companies | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Corning Incorporated | Corning | Manufacturing | Concrete, Glass, and Building Materials |
CBS Corporation | New York | Media and Entertainment | Radio and Television Broadcasting |
Bristol Myers Squibb Company | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Biotechnology |
Citigroup Incorporated | New York | Financial Services | Banks |
Goldman Sachs | New York | Financial Services | Personal Financial Planning and Private Banking |
American International Group (AIG) | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. | New York | Business Services | Advertising, Marketing and PR |
BlackRock, Inc. | New York | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
MetLife Inc. | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. | New York | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
Time Warner Cable | New York | Telecommunications | Cable Television Providers |
Morgan Stanley | New York | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
American Express Company | New York | Financial Services | Credit Cards and Related Services |
International Business Machines Corporation | Armonk | Computers and Electronics | Computers, Parts and Repair |
TIAA-CREF | New York | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
JPMorgan Chase and Co. | New York | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | New York | Media and Entertainment | Newspapers, Books and Periodicals |
L-3 Communications Inc. | New York | Manufacturing | Aerospace and Defense |
Colgate-Palmolive Company | New York | Consumer Services | Personal Care |
New York Life Insurance Company | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Time Warner Inc. | New York | Media and Entertainment | Media and Entertainment Other |
Cablevision Systems Corp. | Bethpage | Media and Entertainment | Radio and Television Broadcasting |
CA Technologies, Inc. | Islandia | Software and Internet | Software |
Verizon Communications Inc. | New York | Telecommunications | Telephone Service Providers and Carriers |
Hess Corporation | New York | Energy and Utilities | Gasoline and Oil Refineries |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in New York since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about Microsoft SQL Server programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized Microsoft SQL Server experts
- Get up to speed with vital Microsoft SQL Server programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…