SharePoint Training Classes in Napa, California
Learn SharePoint in Napa, California and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current SharePoint related training offerings in Napa, California: SharePoint Training
SharePoint Training Catalog
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- LINUX SHELL SCRIPTING
29 May, 2024 - 30 May, 2024 - ASP.NET Core MVC, Rev. 6.0
19 August, 2024 - 20 August, 2024 - Go Language Essentials
29 July, 2024 - 1 August, 2024 - DOCKER WITH KUBERNETES ADMINISTRATION
6 May, 2024 - 10 May, 2024 - VMware vSphere 8.0 with ESXi and vCenter
10 June, 2024 - 14 June, 2024 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
One of the most significant developments of mankind has been the art of writing. The earliest type of writing was in the form of graffiti and paintings on rocks and walls of caves. The first people who engaged in writing are reported to have been Sumerians and the Egyptians around 3500-3200 BC.[i] Early writing of this type was in the form of cuneiform and hieroglyphics. After that, writing emerged in different styles and form per the different societies and differences in expression.
Words are magical. They have preserved records of civilizations. They express desires and dreams and thoughts. But why write at all? What was or is the motive for writing? People write for different reasons. Some write because they have something to say; something to share with others, to inform. Others write to share their feelings.
George Orwell claimed there are four main reasons why people write as depicted below:
· Sheer Egoism: According to this concept, people write because they want to be talked about; they want to reveal their cleverness. People who are motivated by sheer egoism desire to be counted among the top crust of humanity such as scientists, artists, politicians, lawyers and successful businessmen who are always putting their thoughts in print.
No industry is as global as software development. Pervasive networking means that software developers can, and do, work from anywhere. This has led many businesses to hiring development subcontractors in other countries, aiming to find good development talent at lower prices, or with fewer hassles on entry into the US.
While this is an ongoing and dynamic equilibrium, there are compelling reasons for doing software development in the United States, or using a hybrid model where some parts of the task are parceled out to foreign contractors and some are handled locally.
Development Methodologies
The primary reason for developing software overseas is cost reduction. The primary argument against overseas software development is slower development cycles. When software still used the "waterfall" industrial process for project management (where everything is budgeted in terms of time at the beginning of the project), offshoring was quite compelling. As more companies emulate Google and Facebook's process of "release early, update often, and refine from user feedback," an increasing premium has been put on software teams that are small enough to be agile (indeed, the development process is called Agile Development), and centralized enough, in terms of time zones, that collaborators can work together. This has made both Google and Facebook leaders in US-based software development, though they both still maintain teams of developers in other countries tasked with specific projects.
Localization For Americans
The United States is still one of the major markets for software development, and projects aimed at American customers needs to meet cultural norms. This applies to any country, not just the U.S. This puts a premium on software developers who aren't just fluent in English, but native speakers, and who understand American culture. While it's possible (and even likely) to make server-side software, and management utilities that can get by with terse, fractured English, anything that's enterprise-facing or consumer-facing requires more work on polish and presentation than is practical using outsourced developers. There is a reason why the leaders in software User Interface development are all US-based companies, and that's because consumer-focused design is still an overwhelming US advantage.
Ongoing Concerns
The primary concern for American software development is talent production. The US secondary education system produces a much smaller percentage of students with a solid math and engineering background, and while US universities lead the world in their computer science and engineering curricula, slightly under half of all of those graduates are from foreign countries, because American students don't take the course loads needed to succeed in them. Software development companies in the United States are deeply concerned about getting enough engineers and programmers out of the US university system. Some, such as Google, are trying to get programmers hooked on logical problem solving at a young age, with the Summer of Code programs. Others, like Microsoft, offer scholarships for computer science degrees.
Overall, the changes in project management methodologies mean that the US is the current leader in software development, and so long as the primary market for software remains English and American-centric, that's going to remain true. That trend is far from guaranteed, and in the world of software, things can change quickly.
Python and Ruby, each with roots going back into the 1990s, are two of the most popular interpreted programming languages today. Ruby is most widely known as the language in which the ubiquitous Ruby on Rails web application framework is written, but it also has legions of fans that use it for things that have nothing to do with the web. Python is a big hit in the numerical and scientific computing communities at the present time, rapidly displacing such longtime stalwarts as R when it comes to these applications. It too, however, is also put to a myriad of other uses, and the two languages probably vie for the title when it comes to how flexible their users find them.
A Matter of Personality...
That isn't to say that there aren't some major, immediately noticeable, differences between the two programming tongues. Ruby is famous for its flexibility and eagerness to please; it is seen by many as a cleaned-up continuation of Perl's "Do What I Mean" philosophy, whereby the interpreter does its best to figure out the meaning of evening non-canonical syntactic constructs. In fact, the language's creator, Yukihiro Matsumoto, chose his brainchild's name in homage to that earlier language's gemstone-inspired moniker.
Python, on the other hand, takes a very different tact. In a famous Python Enhancement Proposal called "The Zen of Python," longtime Pythonista Tim Peters declared it to be preferable that there should only be a single obvious way to do anything. Python enthusiasts and programmers, then, generally prize unanimity of style over syntactic flexibility compared to those who choose Ruby, and this shows in the code they create. Even Python's whitespace-sensitive parsing has a feel of lending clarity through syntactical enforcement that is very much at odds with the much fuzzier style of typical Ruby code.
For example, Python's much-admired list comprehension feature serves as the most obvious way to build up certain kinds of lists according to initial conditions:
a = [x**3 for x in range(10,20)]
b = [y for y in a if y % 2 == 0]
first builds up a list of the cubes of all of the numbers between 10 and 19 (yes, 19), assigning the result to 'a'. A second list of those elements in 'a' which are even is then stored in 'b'. One natural way to do this in Ruby is probably:
a = (10..19).map {|x| x ** 3}
b = a.select {|y| y.even?}
but there are a number of obvious alternatives, such as:
a = (10..19).collect do |x|
x ** 3
end
b = a.find_all do |y|
y % 2 == 0
end
It tends to be a little easier to come up with equally viable, but syntactically distinct, solutions in Ruby compared to Python, even for relatively simple tasks like the above. That is not to say that Ruby is a messy language, either; it is merely that it is somewhat freer and more forgiving than Python is, and many consider Python's relative purity in this regard a real advantage when it comes to writing clear, easily understandable code.
And Somewhat One of Performance
Another blanket article about the pros and cons of Direct to Consumer (D2C) isn’t needed, I know. By now, we all know the rules for how this model enters a market: its disruption fights any given sector’s established sales model, a fuzzy compromise is temporarily met, and the lean innovator always wins out in the end.
That’s exactly how it played out in the music industry when Apple and record companies created a digital storefront in iTunes to usher music sales into the online era. What now appears to have been a stopgap compromise, iTunes was the standard model for 5-6 years until consumers realized there was no point in purchasing and owning digital media when internet speeds increased and they could listen to it for free through a music streaming service. In 2013, streaming models are the new music consumption standard. Netflix is nearly parallel in the film and TV world, though they’ve done a better job keeping it all under one roof. Apple mastered retail sales so well that the majority of Apple products, when bought in-person, are bought at an Apple store. That’s even more impressive when you consider how few Apple stores there are in the U.S. (253) compared to big box electronics stores that sell Apple products like Best Buy (1,100) Yet while some industries have implemented a D2C approach to great success, others haven’t even dipped a toe in the D2C pool, most notably the auto industry.
What got me thinking about this topic is the recent flurry of attention Tesla Motors has received for its D2C model. It all came to a head at the beginning of July when a petition on whitehouse.gov to allow Tesla to sell directly to consumers in all 50 states reached the 100,000 signatures required for administration comment. As you might imagine, many powerful car dealership owners armed with lobbyists have made a big stink about Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO and Product Architect, choosing to sidestep the traditional supply chain and instead opting to sell directly to their customers through their website. These dealership owners say that they’re against the idea because they want to protect consumers, but the real motive is that they want to defend their right to exist (and who wouldn’t?). They essentially have a monopoly at their position in the sales process, and they want to keep it that way. More frightening for the dealerships is the possibility that once Tesla starts selling directly to consumers, so will the big three automakers, and they fear that would be the end of the road for their business. Interestingly enough, the big three flirted with the idea of D2C in the early 90’s before they were met with fierce backlash from dealerships. I’m sure the dealership community has no interest in mounting a fight like that again.
To say that the laws preventing Tesla from selling online are peripherally relevant would be a compliment. By and large, the laws the dealerships point to fall under the umbrella of “Franchise Laws” that were put in place at the dawn of car sales to protect franchisees against manufacturers opening their own stores and undercutting the franchise that had invested so much to sell the manufacturer’s cars. There’s certainly a need for those laws to exist, because no owner of a dealership selling Jeeps wants Chrysler to open their own dealership next door and sell them for substantially less. However, because Tesla is independently owned and isn’t currently selling their cars through any third party dealership, this law doesn’t really apply to them. Until their cars are sold through independent dealerships, they’re incapable of undercutting anyone by implementing D2C structure.
Tech Life in California
| Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattel, Inc. | El Segundo | Retail | Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores |
| Spectrum Group International, Inc. | Irvine | Retail | Retail Other |
| Chevron Corp | San Ramon | Energy and Utilities | Gasoline and Oil Refineries |
| Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. | Pasadena | Real Estate and Construction | Construction and Remodeling |
| eBay Inc. | San Jose | Software and Internet | E-commerce and Internet Businesses |
| Broadcom Corporation | Irvine | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Franklin Templeton Investments | San Mateo | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
| Pacific Life Insurance Company | Newport Beach | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
| Tutor Perini Corporation | Sylmar | Real Estate and Construction | Construction and Remodeling |
| SYNNEX Corporation | Fremont | Software and Internet | Data Analytics, Management and Storage |
| Core-Mark International Inc | South San Francisco | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Los Angeles | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
| Yahoo!, Inc. | Sunnyvale | Software and Internet | Software and Internet Other |
| Edison International | Rosemead | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
| Ingram Micro, Inc. | Santa Ana | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| Safeway, Inc. | Pleasanton | Retail | Grocery and Specialty Food Stores |
| Gilead Sciences, Inc. | San Mateo | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
| AECOM Technology Corporation | Los Angeles | Real Estate and Construction | Architecture,Engineering and Design |
| Reliance Steel and Aluminum | Los Angeles | Manufacturing | Metals Manufacturing |
| Live Nation, Inc. | Beverly Hills | Media and Entertainment | Performing Arts |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Sunnyvale | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Pacific Gas and Electric Corp | San Francisco | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
| Electronic Arts Inc. | Redwood City | Software and Internet | Games and Gaming |
| Oracle Corporation | Redwood City | Software and Internet | Software and Internet Other |
| Symantec Corporation | Mountain View | Software and Internet | Data Analytics, Management and Storage |
| Dole Food Company, Inc. | Thousand Oaks | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
| CBRE Group, Inc. | Los Angeles | Real Estate and Construction | Real Estate Investment and Development |
| First American Financial Corporation | Santa Ana | Financial Services | Financial Services Other |
| The Gap, Inc. | San Francisco | Retail | Clothing and Shoes Stores |
| Ross Stores, Inc. | Pleasanton | Retail | Clothing and Shoes Stores |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | San Diego | Telecommunications | Wireless and Mobile |
| Charles Schwab Corporation | San Francisco | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
| Sempra Energy | San Diego | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
| Western Digital Corporation | Irvine | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| Health Net, Inc. | Woodland Hills | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotech Other |
| Allergan, Inc. | Irvine | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Biotechnology |
| The Walt Disney Company | Burbank | Media and Entertainment | Motion Picture and Recording Producers |
| Hewlett-Packard Company | Palo Alto | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| URS Corporation | San Francisco | Real Estate and Construction | Architecture,Engineering and Design |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | San Jose | Computers and Electronics | Networking Equipment and Systems |
| Wells Fargo and Company | San Francisco | Financial Services | Banks |
| Intel Corporation | Santa Clara | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | Santa Clara | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Sanmina Corporation | San Jose | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Santa Clara | Telecommunications | Telecommunications Equipment and Accessories |
| Avery Dennison Corporation | Pasadena | Manufacturing | Paper and Paper Products |
| The Clorox Company | Oakland | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
| Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| Amgen Inc | Thousand Oaks | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Biotechnology |
| McKesson Corporation | San Francisco | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
| DIRECTV | El Segundo | Telecommunications | Cable Television Providers |
| Visa, Inc. | San Mateo | Financial Services | Credit Cards and Related Services |
| Google, Inc. | Mountain View | Software and Internet | E-commerce and Internet Businesses |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in California since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about SharePoint programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized SharePoint experts
- Get up to speed with vital SharePoint programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…
Interesting Reads Take a class with us and receive a book of your choosing for 50% off MSRP.
