Microsoft SQL Server Training Classes in St. Cloud, Minnesota
Learn Microsoft SQL Server in St. Cloud, Minnesota and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current Microsoft SQL Server related training offerings in St. Cloud, Minnesota: Microsoft SQL Server Training
Microsoft SQL Server Training Catalog
subcategories
Microsoft SQL Server Classes
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- OpenShift Fundamentals
24 June, 2024 - 26 June, 2024 - Object-Oriented Programming in C# Rev. 6.1
24 June, 2024 - 28 June, 2024 - RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX AUTOMATION WITH ANSIBLE
3 June, 2024 - 6 June, 2024 - Linux Fundaments GL120
15 July, 2024 - 19 July, 2024 - RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX V7 DIFFERENCES
13 May, 2024 - 15 May, 2024 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
Over time, companies are migrating from COBOL to the latest standard of C# solutions due to reasons such as cumbersome deployment processes, scarcity of trained developers, platform dependencies, increasing maintenance fees. Whether a company wants to migrate to reporting applications, operational infrastructure, or management support systems, shifting from COBOL to C# solutions can be time-consuming and highly risky, expensive, and complicated. However, the following four techniques can help companies reduce the complexity and risk around their modernization efforts.
All COBOL to C# Solutions are Equal
It can be daunting for a company to sift through a set of sophisticated services and tools on the market to boost their modernization efforts. Manual modernization solutions often turn into an endless nightmare while the automated ones are saturated with solutions that generate codes that are impossible to maintain and extend once the migration is over. However, your IT department can still work with tools and services and create code that is easier to manage if it wants to capitalize on technologies such as DevOps.
Narrow the Focus
Most legacy systems are incompatible with newer systems. For years now, companies have passed legacy systems to one another without considering functional relationships and proper documentation features. However, a detailed analysis of databases and legacy systems can be useful in decision-making and risk mitigation in any modernization effort. It is fairly common for companies to uncover a lot of unused and dead code when they analyze their legacy inventory carefully. Those discoveries, however can help reduce the cost involved in project implementation and the scope of COBOL to C# modernization. Research has revealed that legacy inventory analysis can result in a 40% reduction of modernization risk. Besides making the modernization effort less complex, trimming unused and dead codes and cost reduction, companies can gain a lot more from analyzing these systems.
Understand Thyself
For most companies, the legacy system entails an entanglement of intertwined code developed by former employees who long ago left the organization. The developers could apply any standards and left behind little documentation, and this made it extremely risky for a company to migrate from a COBOL to C# solution. In 2013, CIOs teamed up with other IT stakeholders in the insurance industry in the U.S to conduct a study that found that only 18% of COBOL to C# modernization projects complete within the scheduled period. Further research revealed that poor legacy application understanding was the primary reason projects could not end as expected.
Furthermore, using the accuracy of the legacy system for planning and poor understanding of the breadth of the influence of the company rules and policies within the legacy system are some of the risks associated with migrating from COBOL to C# solutions. The way an organization understands the source environment could also impact the ability to plan and implement a modernization project successfully. However, accurate, in-depth knowledge about the source environment can help reduce the chances of cost overrun since workers understand the internal operations in the migration project. That way, companies can understand how time and scope impact the efforts required to implement a plan successfully.
Use of Sequential Files
Companies often use sequential files as an intermediary when migrating from COBOL to C# solution to save data. Alternatively, sequential files can be used for report generation or communication with other programs. However, software mining doesn’t migrate these files to SQL tables; instead, it maintains them on file systems. Companies can use data generated on the COBOL system to continue to communicate with the rest of the system at no risk. Sequential files also facilitate a secure migration path to advanced standards such as MS Excel.
Modern systems offer companies a range of portfolio analysis that allows for narrowing down their scope of legacy application migration. Organizations may also capitalize on it to shed light on migration rules hidden in the ancient legacy environment. COBOL to C# modernization solution uses an extensible and fully maintainable code base to develop functional equivalent target application. Migration from COBOL solution to C# applications involves language translation, analysis of all artifacts required for modernization, system acceptance testing, and database and data transfer. While it’s optional, companies could need improvements such as coding improvements, SOA integration, clean up, screen redesign, and cloud deployment.
Java still has its place in the world of software development, but is it quickly becoming obsolete by the more dynamically enabled Python programming language? The issue is hotly contested by both sides of the debate. Java experts point out that Java is still being developed with more programmer friendly updates. Python users swear that Java can take up to ten times longer to develop. Managers that need to make the best decision for a company need concrete information so that an informed and rational decision can be made.
First, Java is a static typed language while Python is dynamically typed. Static typed languages require that each variable name must be tied to both a type and an object. Dynamically typed languages only require that a variable name only gets bound to an object. Immediately, this puts Python ahead of the game in terms of productivity since a static typed language requires several elements and can make errors in coding more likely.
Python uses a concise language while Java uses verbose language. Concise language, as the name suggests, gets straight to the point without extra words. Removing additional syntax can greatly reduce the amount of time required to program. A simple call in Java, such as the ever notorious "Hello, World" requires three several lines of coding while Python requires a single sentence. Java requires the use of checked exceptions. If the exceptions are not caught or thrown out then the code fails to compile. In terms of language, Python certainly has surpassed Java in terms of brevity.
Additionally, while Java's string handling capabilities have improved they haven't yet matched the sophistication of Python's. Web applications rely upon fast load times and extraneous code can increase user wait time. Python optimizes code in ways that Java doesn't, and this can make Python a more efficient language. However, Java does run faster than Python and this can be a significant advantage for programmers using Java. When you factor in the need for a compiler for Java applications the speed factor cancels itself out leaving Python and Java at an impasse.
While a programmer will continue to argue for the language that makes it easiest based on the programmer's current level of knowledge, new software compiled with Python takes less time and provides a simplified coding language that reduces the chance for errors. When things go right, Java works well and there are no problems. However, when errors get introduced into the code, it can become extremely time consuming to locate and correct those errors. Python generally uses less code to begin with and makes it easier and more efficient to work with.
Ultimately, both languages have their own strengths and weaknesses. For creating simple applications, Python provides a simpler and more effective application. Larger applications can benefit from Java and the verbosity of the code actually makes it more compatible with future versions. Python code has been known to break with new releases. Ultimately, Python works best as a type of connecting language to conduct quick and dirty work that would be too intensive when using Java alone. In this sense, Java is a low-level implementation language. While both languages are continuing to develop, it's unlikely that one language will surpass the other for all programming needs in the near future.
When you think about the black market, I’m sure the majority of you will think of prohibition days. When alcohol was made illegal, it did two things: It made the bad guys more money, and it put the average joe in a dangerous position while trying to acquire it. Bring in the 21stcentury. Sure, there still is a black market… but come on, who is afraid of mobsters anymore? Today, we have a gaming black market. It has been around for years, but will it survive? With more and more games moving towards auction houses, could game companies “tame” the gaming black market?
In the old days of gaming on the internet, we spent most of our online time playing hearts, spades… whatever we could do while connected to the internet. As the years went by, better and better games came about. Then, suddenly, interactive multiplayer games came into the picture. These interactive games, mainly MMORPGS, allowed for characters to pick up and keep randomly generated objects known as “loot”. This evolution of gaming created the black market.
In the eyes of the software companies, the game is only being leased/rented by the end user. You don’t actually have any rights to the game. This is where the market becomes black. The software companies don’t want you making money of “virtual” goods that are housed on the software or servers of the game you are playing on. The software companies, at this point, started to get smarter.
Where there is a demand…
Tech Life in Minnesota
Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
---|---|---|---|
The Affluent Traveler | Saint Paul | Travel, Recreation and Leisure | Travel, Recreation, and Leisure Other |
Xcel Energy Inc. | Minneapolis | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans | Minneapolis | Financial Services | Personal Financial Planning and Private Banking |
CHS Inc. | Inver Grove Heights | Agriculture and Mining | Agriculture and Mining Other |
Hormel Foods Corporation | Austin | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
St. Jude Medical, Inc. | Saint Paul | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Medical Devices |
The Mosaic Company | Minneapolis | Agriculture and Mining | Mining and Quarrying |
Ecolab Inc. | Saint Paul | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
Donaldson Company, Inc. | Minneapolis | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Michael Foods, Inc. | Minnetonka | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
Regis Corporation | Minneapolis | Retail | Retail Other |
Fastenal Company | Winona | Wholesale and Distribution | Wholesale and Distribution Other |
Securian Financial | Saint Paul | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
UnitedHealth Group | Minnetonka | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
The Travelers Companies, Inc. | Saint Paul | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Imation Corp. | Saint Paul | Computers and Electronics | Networking Equipment and Systems |
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Eden Prairie | Transportation and Storage | Warehousing and Storage |
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | Minneapolis | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
Best Buy Co. Inc. | Minneapolis | Retail | Retail Other |
Nash Finch Company | Minneapolis | Wholesale and Distribution | Grocery and Food Wholesalers |
Medtronic, Inc. | Minneapolis | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Medical Devices |
LAND O'LAKES, INC. | Saint Paul | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
General Mills, Inc. | Minneapolis | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
Pentair, Inc. | Minneapolis | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Supervalu Inc. | Eden Prairie | Retail | Grocery and Specialty Food Stores |
U.S. Bancorp | Minneapolis | Financial Services | Banks |
Target Corporation, Inc. | Minneapolis | Retail | Department Stores |
3M Company | Saint Paul | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in Minnesota since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about Microsoft SQL Server programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized Microsoft SQL Server experts
- Get up to speed with vital Microsoft SQL Server programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…